Topics
- Asking Clinical Questions You Can Answer
- Searching the Literature
- Evaluating Research Studies
- For More Information
Asking Clinical Questions You Can Answer
Each encounter with a patient may raise many questions about diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and other aspects of clinical practice. There is no perfect question, but questions that are composed of four key elements are more likely to lead you efficiently to precise, relevant answers.
- the patient or problem
- the clinical action or intervention being considered
- a comparison intervention, if relevant
- the outcome
The question you formulate using the four elements above will guide your search for clinical evidence using the tools mentioned below. For more information, read The Well-Built Clinical Question.
Question 1: Clinical Scenario
I am an adult and women's health ARNP providing primary care to approximately 250 of the 760 adolescents and adult women in a women's prison. My primary patients range in age from 18 to 72 with an average age of 30.
Health care is paid for by the state through the Department of Corrections. The mandate for prisoner health care is that inmates receive adequate and basic care. There is a limited formulary within the prison system but this can be expanded with proven need and approval by the pharmacy committee. Use of prescriptions, including antibiotics, are monitored at each site and on a state-wide level.
One of the most common presenting problems is acute maxillary sinusitis. There is no single protocol for care in the treatment of sinusitis in this setting, but one is under development.
Sample Question:
Under what conditions are antibiotics effective in eliminating symptoms of acute maxillary sinusitis in adults?
Question 2
What are effective interventions for preventing falls in the elderly?
Searching the Literature
Researchers perform comprehensive literature reviews as a preliminary step in research studies. Clinicians perform more focused searches of the literature to discover information that is useful for patient care. Clinical information is developed gradually through research studies and individual interactions between clinicians and patients. Different types of publications summarize information from both these sources.
This outline highlights the major resources a clinician might consult to answer a clinical question. Not every question requires consulting the full range of resources.
The sample searches below build on the basic techniques demonstrated in:
- Getting Started with Library Resources
- Navigating the Web: Using Search Tools and Evaluating Resources
- Basic Introduction to Evidence-Based Practice Resources
Textbooks
- Core textbooks summarize current standards of care, based on the experiences of expert clinicians and the results of research studies.
- Textbooks are concise and easy to scan for relevant information, but ...
- Textbooks are expensive and take several years to publish, so information in them may be incomplete or inaccurate if new knowledge has been developed, which is especially likely regarding therapies.
- Begin by looking in
UpToDate
The most current, extensive electronic textbook for medicine. Recommendations are based on the available evidence and the author's clinical experience. Continuously updated. -
Locate additional textbooks using:
- HealthLinks: Textbooks for electronic textbooks
- UW Libraries Catalog for print textbooks | Sample Search
- Review articles summarize a number of studies on the same topic.
- Reviews can lead you to extensive lists of research articles on a similar topic, but ...
- It may not be possible to tell what criteria the author used in selecting the studies to be included or excluded.
-
Locate review articles using:
-
Check availability of journals using:
- HealthLinks: Journals for electronic journals | SampleSearch
- UW Libraries Catalog for print journals | SampleSearch
Research Articles
- Research articles are published results of research studies.
- Research studies are the primary means of developing new clinical knowledge, but ...
- Research articles vary in the level of detail given about the study. You may need to do your own evaluation.
-
Locate research articles using:
- PubMed |
Search Tips
Hint: you can limit Publication Type, such as randomized controlled trial or clinical trial - PubMed Clinical Queries | Search Tips | Sample Search | Video
-
CINAHL
| SearchTips
Hint: you can limit with Document Type, such as Clinical Trial or Research - More databases ...
- PubMed |
Search Tips
Clinical Practice Guidelines
- Guidelines are systematically developed statements of appropriate care designed to assist the practitioner and patient make decisions about appropriate health care for specific clinical circumstances.
- Guidelines from reputable, authoritative organizations are usually based on the most current, relevant research, but ...
- Guidelines are developed using widely varying standards. Cost may be considered as well as health outcomes.
-
Locate clinical practice guidelines using:
- National Guideline
Clearinghouse | Sample Search
The National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC) is a comprehensive database of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, the American Medical Association, and the American Association of Health Plans. The database includes structured abstracts, links to full-text guidelines (where available), and ordering information for print copies. -
CINAHL
| Search Tips - MDConsult
| Search Tips
MD Consult Clinical Guidelines section contains over 600 peer-reviewed clinical practice guidelines. MD Consult is an online medical information service containing full-text reference books, guidelines, full-text journals, patient information, and drug information. - Web search engines or subject directories
- Remember to evaluate anything you locate on the web using the Criteria for Evaluating Web Sites on the Navigating the Web: Using Search Tools and Evaluating Resources tutorial.
- National Guideline
Clearinghouse | Sample Search
Structured Abstracts andSummaries
- It is difficult for a clinician to analyze all the information in a field.
- Occasionally you can find a structured abstract or commentary of a research article, such as in ACP Journal Club.
- Other resources, such as UpToDate and Clinical Evidence, offer summaries of evidence-based information on a topic.
-
Locate abstracts and synopses using:
- UpToDate
| Sample
Search
The most current, extensive electronic textbook for Internal Medicine and subspecialties.. Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Family Practice is in development. Recommendations are based on the available evidence and the author's clinical experience. Continuously updated, not by any specific time schedule. - Clinical Evidence
| SampleSearch
Updated compendium of evidence on the effects of clinical interventions. Summarizes the best available evidence and the current state of knowledge, including knowns and unknowns, based on thorough searches. Categorizes interventions as beneficial, likely beneficial, no known benefit, harmful... Covers more than 160 conditions and more than 350 clinical questions. - ACP Journal Club
Value-added abstracts to journal articles selected according to explicit criteria from major peer-reviewed medical journals. - AHRQ Evidence
Syntheses
Evidence reports and technical reviews from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. - Bandolier
1994-. Short evaluations of individual articles dealing with evidence-based clinical practice.
- UpToDate
MetaSearch Engines
- A metasearch engine is a search engine that searches multiple other search engines simultaneously and combines the results.
- Locate evidence-based sources using a metasearch engine:
TRIP Database
TRIP (Turning Research Into Practice) database performs a simple search of more than 75 databases, including CDSR Abstracts, NGC, Bandolier, Evidence-Based Medicine, DARE, POEMs, etc. for access to evidence-based material as well as articles from peer-reviewed journals. Only free online documents are linked. - Search PrimeEvidence

PrimeEvidence searches selected evidence-based documents in the PrimeAnswers database


Search PrimeEvidence: (selected evidence-based documents in the PrimeAnswers database)
Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
- Systematic reviews use explicit methods to identify, select, and critically evaluate relevant research. Meta-analyses are systematic reviews that combine the results of several studies using quantitative statistics.
- Systematic reviews minimize the possibility of bias by using explicit criteria, and expand the relevance of individual studies with limited scope, but ...
- Only a small number of clinical topics are covered by systematic reviews, because they require years of effort to develop.
-
Locate systematic reviews using:
- Cochrane Database
of Systematic Reviews (CDSR)
| Sample
Search
The CDSR is a full-text database containing systematic reviews and protocols (reviews still in progress) of the effects of health care interventions; mainly randomized controlled trials. "Gold Standard." - Database of
Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness (DARE)
Structured abstracts of good quality systematic reviews from around the world. Also part of Cochrane Library. - PubMed
Systematic Reviews | SampleSearch
PubMed Systematic Reviews combines your search term(s) with citations identified as systematic reviews, meta-analyses, reviews of clinical trials, evidence-based medicine, consensus development conferences, and guidelines. - PubMed |
Search Tips | SampleSearch
Hint: you can limit to Publication Type: Meta-Analysis
- Cochrane Database
of Systematic Reviews (CDSR)
Evaluating Research Studies
Before using information as the basis for patient care, you must assess its scientific and clinical merit. The Users' Guides to Evidence-Based Practice provide useful questions to guide your evaluation. Key questions to quickly analyze all types of research studies are listed in Table 1: Guides for Selecting Articles That Are Most Likely to Provide Valid Results.
Sample questions from the guide for articles about therapy are listed below.
Scientific Merit
Was the study design valid?
- Was the assignment of patients to treatments randomized?
- Were all patients who entered the trial properly accounted for and
attributed at its conclusion?
- Was followup complete?
- Were patients analyzed in the groups to which they were randomized?
- Were patients, health workers, and study personnel "blind" to treatment?
- Were the groups similar at the start of the trial?
- Aside from the experimental intervention, were the groups treated equally?
What do the results show?
- How large was the treatment effect?
- How precise was the estimate of the treatment effect?
Clinical Merit
Will the results help me in caring for my patients?
- Can the results be applied to my patient care?
- Were all clinically important outcomes considered?
- Are the likely treatment benefits worth the potential harms and costs?
- How significant is the problem to your patient?
- How appropriate is the intervention to the institution and the patient?
- How feasible is adoption and evaluation of the innovation in your setting?
For More Information
- HealthLinks:
- Evidence-Based Practice Tools Summary
- Evidence-Based Practice and Guidelines Additional tools for locating and evaluating clinical information.
- Selected Evidence-Based Medicine Resources on the Net Resource Information
- Evidence-Based Medicine Web Resources Table
- Basic Introduction to Evidence-Based Practice
- PubMed at the UW
- Center for Health Evidence. Users' Guides to Evidence-Based Practice.
- Greenhalgh, T. How to read a paper: the basics of evidence-based medicine. Originally published in BMJ. 1997.
- Sackett, DL et al. Evidence-based medicine: how to practice and teach EBM, 2d. ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 2000.
- Talbot, LA, ed. Principles and practice of nursing research. St. Louis: Mosby, 1995.
- Weatherall, DJ et al. On dinosaurs and medical textbooks. Commentary. Lancet 1995 Jul 1; 346(8966): 4-5.
- Introduction to Evidence-Based Medicine. Duke University Medical Center Library and University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Health Sciences Library tutorial.
Online Class Evaluation Form (class use only)
Janet G. Schnall, MS, AHIPInformation Management Librarian
Library Liaison to the University of Washington School of Nursing, Department of Pediatrics, Department of Ophthalmology and Multicultural Affairs
schnall@u.washington.edu
healthlinks.washington.edu/hsl/liaisons/schnall/
Created March 31, 1999.
Revised April 7, 2003.
This page may be reprinted or adapted for academic nonprofit purposes, providing the source is accurately quoted and credited.
